Oddly, the whitehouse.com site is not going to present the real data from the Sinclair test. One wonders why they have such thin skin about the matter. Why go to all that trouble and then bury the results. The most we have is the analysis of one expert of a few questions...
Anyway, I guess this matter is far from over.
Blog exploring the recent charges from a man named Larry Sinclair that he and Barack Obama engaged, on two occasions, in the use of cocaine and crack and had sexual contact during the year 1999 in Chicago while Sinclair was visiting.
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Obama Innocent?
Looks like Larry Sinclair's polygraph tests revealed deception in his answers. No word yet on which answers, but it is a pretty interesting outcome. See whitehouse.com for the details.
I guess I thought that anyone who would put his money where his mouth is and take a public polygraph probably had nothing to hide. Boy was I wrong.
I guess I thought that anyone who would put his money where his mouth is and take a public polygraph probably had nothing to hide. Boy was I wrong.
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Larry Sinclair Polygraph Test
OK, well, finally some real investigation into this. Whitehouse.com is doing a polygraph test of Sinclair. They have an update here on the test and the accompanying drug test. They say they are waiting for verification of the results by a second polygraph expert before releasing the video. The results should be pretty interesting. Either way it comes out, the press should really cover this so that people can either have their minds eased about Obama, or be informed about his activities.
The other question is whether polygraphs really mean that much, but there are precious few alternatives.
The other question is whether polygraphs really mean that much, but there are precious few alternatives.
Labels:
larry sinclair,
lie detector,
obama,
polygraph,
whitehouse.com
Saturday, February 9, 2008
More Videos from Larry Sinclair
Larry Sinclair now has posted a four part video on You Tube where he continues his story about Barack Obama, the drug use, the sex, etc. As of today, still no mention or vetting in the mainstream press. The danger this poses is that people whisper about this and Obama suffers. A real investigation of this would clear the air. Sinclair is not backing down.
Friday, February 1, 2008
Larry Sinclair's Appearance in 1999
So, what did Larry Sinclair look like in 1999? A lot of the doubt about his story comes from those who (rightly) point out that Sinclair is not as handsome as one would expect a companion of Obama's to be. But now on his profile, Sinclair has posted a photograph taken on that 1999 trip so that we can see what he looked like back then. I still have no idea if this story is true, but would love for the media to investigate and either exonerate Obama or establish Sinclair's charges. Because it is hard for me to even look at Obama on television with the thought that these allegations could be true...
Sunday, January 27, 2008
New You Tube Morph
Someone has edited the Sinclair video - mostly adding some "you be the judge" type disclaimers to the first part.
You can see it here.
I've noticed that some people really focus on the sex part, some people on the homosexual part, and some people on the crack part. I think personally the most disturbing allegations against Obama are his using illegal drugs and having what essentially amounts to sex with a stranger. These are still the kinds of behavior that make any person in power a good target for extortion. Suppose someone wants to harm Obama - all they have to do is approach him like Sinclair did - in that compromising position, Sinclair could easily harm Obama either physically or politically with no sweat.
Still no one in the mainstream media has reported on this thing yet. I hope they are doing their homework. I think one role of the press is certainly to expose wrongdoing, but might they not also have a responsibility to investigate and *exonerate* Obama if they find that Sinclair's story is a lie?
You can see it here.
I've noticed that some people really focus on the sex part, some people on the homosexual part, and some people on the crack part. I think personally the most disturbing allegations against Obama are his using illegal drugs and having what essentially amounts to sex with a stranger. These are still the kinds of behavior that make any person in power a good target for extortion. Suppose someone wants to harm Obama - all they have to do is approach him like Sinclair did - in that compromising position, Sinclair could easily harm Obama either physically or politically with no sweat.
Still no one in the mainstream media has reported on this thing yet. I hope they are doing their homework. I think one role of the press is certainly to expose wrongdoing, but might they not also have a responsibility to investigate and *exonerate* Obama if they find that Sinclair's story is a lie?
Labels:
crack,
larry sinclair,
mainstream press,
obama,
youtube
Friday, January 25, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)